We distinguish facts, source assertions, calculations, assumptions and judgments. Conclusions must not exceed the evidence.
Material findings identify their sources and limitations. We retain significant contrary evidence and explain what remains unknown.
AI assists research and drafting. Each article identifies the tools used and the person and actual scope of review. Automated file validation does not establish whether findings are true.
Publication requires the publisher’s personal final review. Material changes are documented in the article’s history and the corrections register.
Each article also states the AI usage behind it where it was measured: the number of model calls, the tokens processed (which includes the model re-reading its own working context, so the figure is large) and the tokens generated. The figures come from the session logs of the tools used, never from estimates; where no log exists, the article says the usage was not measured. They are indicative and not comparable across providers.